‘Revisiting Beveridge: A Benefits and Welfare System for the 21st Century’

Frank Field unveils new plan to make welfare system fit for the 21st century
  • Lord Field of Birkenhead and Andrew Forsey propose replacing existing National Insurance system with a new Social Security Mutual
  • Contributors, not the Treasury, should own the new system
  • Radical change is required to fulfil Beveridge’s principles for the welfare state today

PDF: Revisiting Beveridge: A Benefits and Welfare System for the 21st Century

Politeia today publishes a radical new blueprint to address the social insecurity of those trapped on the fringes of poverty and ‘level up’ the whole country. Produced by two of the country’s leading thinkers in the field of welfare reform, it explains why comprehensive change is urgently needed if the welfare state today is to stay true to the principles and aims of its founding architect, Sir William Beveridge.

Revisiting Beveridge: A Benefits and Welfare System for the 21st Century has been written by former welfare reform minister Frank Field – recently ennobled as Lord Field of Birkenhead – and Andrew Forsey, the National Director of hunger elimination charity Feeding Britain.

The centrepiece of their plan is to cut loose the National Insurance system from Whitehall by establishing an independent mutual, owned by all those making National Insurance contributions (NICs) and being controlled and managed on their behalf by an elected board. This approach would cover social security, health and social care, so that the welfare state could be financed and run in a manner that chimes with what the electorate deems fair. It would be funded from NICs, not taxation, which – say the authors – is the only way to combine the self-interest of individuals with the interests of the country as a whole and, in particular, those of the poor.

Field and Forsey propose that:

  • A national Social Security Mutual would replace much of the present system. It would collect National Insurance contributions and administer benefit claims during periods of unemployment or sickness.
  • The new national Social Security Mutual would be funded by contributions from workers, employers and the state.
  • There would be individual member ownership and control through an elected board, designed to ‘protect contributions from Treasury raids’.
  • As a first step, the Government Actuary Department should be asked to consider how a fundamentally restructured National Insurance scheme could work and how much it would cost.

(A comprehensive guide to the proposed New Contract for National Insurance can be seen by clicking here)

The authors assert that the Prime Minister’s two key pledges – to ‘level up’ the country and ‘fix’ social care – can only be achieved by rebuilding the welfare state with a radically reformed National Insurance system and the creation of jobs for all adults at risk of becoming long-term unemployed.

In considering a range of specific problems across the welfare system, prompted by the uncertainties of today’s labour market, inadequate housing, poor training, the low pay trap and poor life chances for children and adults alike, they set out what reforms are needed to tackle each of these contingencies. They also explain how and why the overarching system itself needs a far-reaching overhaul if funds are to be raised and people supported to greater self-reliance, rewarding jobs and fruitful lives.

The changes they propose would restore the incentives which Beveridge built into the system: for employees to work and pay in when earning, and to draw out when earnings are interrupted or ceased – with employers’ contributions being reduced if they improve the pay and security of their workforce.

Lord Field of Birkenhead says:

‘Beveridge conceived a fully-funded welfare state through which today’s benefits would be funded by previous contributions, arguing that workers, employers and the state each had an interest in maintaining an effective welfare system. Today, sadly, the provision of benefits or services takes no account of people’s prior contribution to society, but instead punishes those who have saved or want to work. That’s why rebuilding welfare around the principles of universality and actuarial soundness is the way to create an effective system in which the public can have confidence.’

His co-author Andrew Forsey adds:

‘Our proposals would achieve the two key objectives of moving our country towards full employment while giving voters control over their National Insurance contributions. Reliance on means testing by successive governments has corroded the ability of the welfare state to meet need in a way that is seen to be fair. Such a trend, along with the failings in the labour, housing and social care markets, has left millions of households leading a precarious existence, with basic needs unmet or sacrificed.’

In her preface to the paper, Dr. Sheila Lawlor, Politeia’s Founder and Director of Research, writes:

‘Like Beveridge, the authors seek to slay the five giants of want, ignorance, disease, squalor, idleness. But they go beyond Beveridge to identify the contemporary causes of these giants: they propose fresh approaches for slaying them, on the same basis of the contributory principle.’

Jonathan Isaby, Director of Politeia, says:

‘Working with Andrew Forsey, Lord Field of Birkenhead has provided both a typically thoughtful analysis of the pitfalls of the current welfare system and some imaginative solutions, drawing on Beveridge’s original principles. The proposals represent a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate about reducing and eradicating poverty which merit serious consideration.’

ENDS

 

Notes to Editors

  1. Established in 1995, Politeia is an independent, non-partisan think-tank providing a forum to discuss economic, constitutional and social policy with a particular focus on the role of the state in people’s lives.
  2. Revisiting Beveridge: A Benefits and Welfare System for the 21st Century by Frank Field and Andrew Forsey will be published by Politeia on Wednesday 23rd September. A pdf of the publication is available here and a summary of the headline proposal for a New Contract for National Insurance is available here.
  3. Frank Field was MP for Birkenhead between 1979 and 2019. He is a former Chair of the House of Commons Work and Pensions Select Committee (2015-2019) and its predecessor, the Social Security Select Committee (1990-1997), and was Minister for Welfare Reform at the Department for Social Security between 1997 and 1998. In 2010 he was appointed by the then Prime Minister, David Cameron, to lead the Independent Review on Poverty and Life Chances. In September 2020 he was ennobled as Lord Field of Birkenhead.
  4. Andrew Forsey is National Director of Feeding Britain, a charity seeking to eliminate hunger in the UK, and was previously senior parliamentary researcher to Frank Field.

Lord Field of Birkenhead

Served as Member of Parliament for Birkenhead between 1979 and 2019, and was nominated to the House of Lords in August 2020. He was elected by MPs, in 2015, to be the Chair of the Work and Pensions Select Committee, a position he held until 2019. In 2010, he was appointed by the then Prime Minister, David Cameron, to lead an Independent Review on Poverty Life Chances which culminated with the publication of The Foundation Years: preventing poor children becoming poor adults.

View All Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

X
X