The UK and the EU: What must change?
Fundamental Reform or Brexit? As David Cameron prepares to set out his stall in Brussels this week, senior Conservative MPs say what must change in our relationship with the EU.
As the prime minister prepares to set out his goals for renegotiation at a Brussels summit, he may find an agenda there quite different from that wanted by people at home. Here, three senior MPs explain what is needed in Politeia’s publication, The UK and the EU: What must Change?
In particular the UK parliament must once again decide on the vital matters which affect national life. The UK courts must once again become the ultimate arbiter of matters such as UK human rights law.
Forthcoming events include:
Introduce Competition and Contribution for Successful Healthcare and Pensions! Changes Needed if UK is to Meet Rising Demand
Western societies are ageing. As people live longer, the ratio of workers to pensioners continues to shrink. At the same time the costs for healthcare and pensions are rising.
Can governments meet growing need and balance the books while encouraging economic growth?
In Paying for the Future: Working Systems for Pensions and Healthcare, Ludger Schuknecht and economists from Germany’s Finance Ministry explain what makes systems effective and cost-efficient.
Early in 2015 the European Central Bank (ECB) committed to a course of Quantitative Easing (QE) for the Eurozone, committing 60bn Euros a month to the zone’s faltering economy until September 2016.
Many people are baffled by 'quantitative easing' and its impact on troubled economies. Yet, QE has been widely adopted by central banks in the last few years to boost demand, output and employment, and to escape the macroeconomic malaise that has afflicted the advanced industrial countries during and since the Great Recession of 2008 - 10.
The European Central Bank’s adoption of a QE programme follows similar action by the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan and the Bank of England.
You can read Professor Congdon's analysis here.
The UK Government Spending Ratio: Back to the 1930s?
Public spending will be at levels of Gordon Brown, says Politeia's new economic spending analysis
David B. Smith
As the debate over reductions to Government spending ratios looks set to dominate the electoral campaign, Politeia’s analysis by the economist, David B. Smith*, considers what the figures for public spending really are.
In The UK Government Spending Ratio: Back to the 1930s?, David B. Smith shows that the changes to accounting procedures and the measures officially used to report public spending ratios tend to underestimate levels of public spending. In particular, the new European rules which have just come into force (ESA 2010) make a like for like comparison difficult to establish. To this problem must be added the further complication of what is, or is not, included by government for calculating public spending.